🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together is populated with individuals seeking new beginnings, trying to break free from drugs or harmful partnerships, only to see hope turn into violence. Chris Kraus repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", making it deliberately jaded through its repetitions. Examples include "He could make a fresh start" and "They chose to begin anew" appear throughout the story. Meanwhile, the author herself appears to be undertaking her individual reinvention, since this appears a different type of work – observational, genuinely novelistic. Yet it turns out to be filled with the familiar conflicts and styles as past novels.

From Chance Novelist to Renowned Book

The writer started out as an visual artist who became a writer unintentionally with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, which was composed of epistles to an unresponsive love interest, elevating confessional female writing from abjection into assassination. She continued writing, but the three subsequent engaging and challenging novels lacked the impact and rawness that the letter form imparted to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her role as a nonconformist creator who had turned into a large-scale low-rent landlord, so there was significant attention on real estate deals. It follows that she now wants to experiment with fresh narrative sources, looking outwards to the experiences of others, at a period in which she claims that current political era makes confessional writing obsolete.

Three Generations, One Unescapable Past

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, covering several time periods – each trapped by their histories. There is the tale of a couple named Emma and Jasper, representations of the author's parents, relocating from the New York borough to rural Connecticut. Then there is the narrative of the author, in the guise of Catt Greene, reckoning with the late recognition of I Love Dick, the ascent of a political figure, and her addict husband her husband Paul. Finally the account of a killing of one troubled youth by another in a locality mostly forsaken by progressive politics only 80 miles from Catt's rural residence in rural Minnesota.

As a reader fond of polished prose of the sort the author herself often avoids, I was enchanted by the narrative style of the first section.

As a reader who appreciates crafted language of the style that the author usually avoids, I was captivated by the storytelling approach of the initial part. There is a new quality of attentiveness that makes room for trivial aspects, like the pail that the young Catt frees from the ice at the opening of the book, aided by her cherished parent. "Look, an ice toy!" she says; "a nice toy", he replies, "the elliptical meanings of words circulating in their speech like sweet treats". The author narrates Emma's narrative with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not precisely her dream."

Letdown and Fragmentation

I was destined to be disappointed when I wished this new voice could persist to the end. Kraus says here that she dislikes the pleasure audiences such as myself have derived from I Love Dick; she's devoted to disruption, to the untidy aesthetics she shares with her idol writer Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her earlier works returns in the middle section. The protagonist is trying to renovate 36 run-down apartments in the city's most challenging districts while traveling between two different states, failing to help Paul control his drinking. She feels helpless as Paul moves between low-resource employment as an recovery specialist in a world fueled by the anger and fear that drives a political win. There are several pages about the protagonist facing cancellation on social media, her occupation changed from "author" to "property owner" on the online encyclopedia. She still gives the impression to care a little too much about this. On one occasion she states that she's looking into the killing so that before exiting the region, "she could potentially understand something about an America that her Twitter detractors would be unable to grasp, would not even perceive".

The Murder Narrative

So then we come to the homicide in question – and the referenced day experienced by the victim with the killer and his companions. Kraus has compelling foundational content, and details moment by moment what occurred as the victim Brandon came to see Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but seems amiably to have occupied the day alongside her friends, loitering fixing his automobile and paying for snacks and drugs, before being shot by Brittney's partner Micah – a youth with psychological issues who has often been institutionalized for fits of anger.

Preoccupation and Open Ends

Catt gets obsessed by the narrative, and I found myself captivated by the way that the author's conflicting impulses towards responsible documentation and reckless transgression wrestle in this part. Yet I wished her to go further into her individual preoccupations here. The most interesting character is the character Brittney, who becomes vivid partly through the protagonist's connection to her – yet another intelligent, harassed young woman spiraling out of control in a struggling, neglected community. The author informs us that Catt converses with Brittney in detention, but she fails to enact these dialogues. The whole section feels strangely incomplete, to the extent that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par